Tempting to comment on the Greek situation beyond the abilities of the players in question,
but ultimately it's what they can or cannot do on the pitch that counts.
Gekas is a difficult
one, he was top scorer in the Bundesliga a couple of seasons back and that is
no mean achievement, but does that mean he can still hack it here or there? No.
But we know
the Prem and the Bundesliga are of similar quality and if a player such
as Fowler, Cole or for that matter Beattie can walk straight into Premier
league teams after a break or a drop into another division, why would you not
try Gekas? Sure he may be unfit and he might need some sharpness but is the
second string the place to get that or to evaluate a player's ability to hack
in the Premier League. No.
Whichever way you look at it, the situation does seem a
little strange especially considering far more qualified people than me, such
as Whittingham no less, has sung his praises more than once.
In the meantime if the Gekas situation is difficult to
comprehend, surely you can't say the same thing about Basinas. Rewind a few
weeks and didn't we all applaud Adams for picking up an old master at poster
shop prices?
The Greek Captain may be creaking at the knees but his
quality is beyond question. No Diarra or Muntari that's for sure, but he must
rank alongside Mendes and Diop as being one of the better midfielders in the Prem.
So then why has he been dropped. Is it injury? Or are Davis, Hughes and Mullens
really that much better?
The answer I fear is that given the choice of one or the
other, but not both, Hart favours effort over ability. Whereas this time last
year we had the two in the form of Diop, Mendes, Lass and Muntari, we now fill
the midfield with carthorses in comparison. Ok even if Diop resembles one there
is no doubting the bloke's ability to grab the ball and make 20 yards in the
blink of an eye, demolishing opponents as he goes. Which reminds me, when is he
back?
This reliance on effort, seen also with Nugent mad dogging
it between penalty areas, appears to be at the root of Hart's philosophy. Use the marines not the SAS, numbers not
tactics, grunt before ability.
Isn't this why we struggled against hungry Boro? We should
have put them to the sword, instead we put bodies behind the ball and relied on
perfect defensive execution. By whom? Davis, Mullens and Hughes?
Sure they are solid
but why tempt fate? Isn't it better to make errors in their box not our own? On
what basis would Hart assume we can keep opponents at bay by inviting them to
attack us? Ok, last year we could do that as demonstrated at United, but this
year we can't.
We have the look of a team that's always going to concede
unless we are playing at home against over paid, unfocused Brazilians. Shouldn't
we therefore be going for the win and make that 2 goals not 1? Inviting any
Premier League team to pick you apart is risky.
It'd be risky with the team we had last year but this year
it's suicide or at the very least it's going to lose us a couple of points when
all three should've been in the bag and wrapped. And let's not forget, we aren't
going to stay in the Premier League with the odd win surrounded by draws and
defeats. Our survival depends on beating our relegation peers, not sharing the
points and hoping for the best.