May 2009 - Front Page Articles

  • Nonsense, nonsense, nonsense

    Who's to blame for the rubbish printed in the Press? The author? The editor? The owner? Or you and I for reading it?

    It seems hardly a day goes by without a sensational story being published about one Club or another. One of the latest fairy stories being that we have approached both Sven and Bilic to become the next manager. Sven I can understand, but why would you risk new money on Bilic when he has yet to achieve anything in the Prem?

    Peter Storrie has denied the Eriksson story calling it nonsense and implying that it's the fabrication of agents. Although it would appear that Sven's own agent has done little to dispel the rumour which you could take as a ‘yes', considering he went out of his way to deny reports when Mexico were still in the equation.

    And now today the Mirror is claiming that the Doc wants Harry back. Why don't we just announce that Aliens have landed on Portsdown Hill? That would have the same effect. And here we are reporting it adding credibility to what is a load of nonsense. Even if it is true, it's still nonsense and we all know why.

    As much as the Club corrects inaccurate ‘reporting' on a regular basis you do get the feeling that some people actually enjoy the coverage. Good and bad. If I was P.F.C. I'd pre-empt the manager gossip and release statements outlining what is happening next. It's not rocket science being able to forecast that the Press and agents will be spreading all sorts of nonsense around in order to promote their wares.

    Imagine how Paul Hart is feeling right now. Rescued us from the drop and now his job is the subject of media tittle-tattle.  Anybody with half a brain can see that a manager's job is one of the first positions under review when a club changes owner, so why not be upfront about it and in the same breath avoid rumour by saying "We are not approaching anybody until it's done and dusted".

    No doubt the Club has its reasons for letting the horse run wild in the streets before lassoing it and tying it down, but we shouldn't be surprised if the new owners take a different view point once the Devil has been chased out of the detail and pen is put to paper.

    Sure we are never going to stop trash publications from publishing trash and neither will this prevent some fan sites for passing this trash off as their own... But it would be great if the Club became ‘gospel' so to speak and provided a steady stream of factual news such that reverting to gutter reports wasn't an option.

     

    Eriksson at City

     

     

     

    Filed under: ,
  • Fan activity trebles on news of takeover

    Anybody who runs a fan site will tell you that traffic increases when there's news about. Good or bad. Redknapp leaving was a high point, so too Adams, although his appointment passed with barely a whimper...

    This week has been no exception and the myPompey servers have been rattling away on news that the Doc has decided to invest in our beloved team.

    What has been unusual though is the number of visits from 'new' locations. We have plenty of members in and around London but as you can see below from this 300 visitor shapshot, quite a few are coming from central London. Presumably much of this is from the newspapers, in fact we know it is, but even so, there must be lots of general interest coming our way. It makes you wonder how busy we'd be if Pret a Manger added a hot zone to each of it's prawn sarnie outlets...

    Take a look also at the global visitor map. This is the same 300 user slice from earlier today. Again something to note. Not much interest from the Middle East but plenty from the West Coast in the US. Not sure what to conclude from either observation other than it is unusual for myPompey. Other sites might wish to comment on their own experiences.

    Whilst you are here do take a look at the front page which has a new Countdown timer, currently showing 78 days til the start of the season.


    myPompey visitor map - 29th May [300 visits shown]

    Filed under: , ,
  • Sold to the man with the deep pockets

    09.20: ‘Good Morning, Peter Storrie speaking.  Er no sorry it was sold last night. Thanks. Bye'

    09.40: ‘Good Morning, Peter Storrie speaking.  Er no sorry it was sold last night.... Thanks. Bye'

    09.45: ‘Good Morning, Peter Storrie speaking.  Er no sorry...  it was sold last night. Thanks. Bye'

    Sods law. You spend 9 months looking for a buyer and half dozen come along at once. What's good for Dr Sulaiman Al Fahim is suddenly good enough for a whole host of other investors sitting on the fence, uhm-ing and ahhh-ing until they see their prize taken from under their noses.

    The fact is, putting short term profitability aside, owning a Premier League football club has to be one the most cost effective ways of getting your name in the media and leveraging the exposure for profit. All of a sudden, Dr Sulaiman Al Fahim will be all over the news (lower case n in case you are wondering....) and quite likely the most prominent person in the south of England. If he wants to be.

    With a catchment of over 5,000,000 residing within 50 miles of the Club (source: Population Unit) AND 8,000,000+ within 60, the ‘Doc' has a wonderful opportunity here. As the ‘ad' below points out, there is no local competition following the demise of the Saints and he will find Hampshire and adjacent counties amendable to a quality product.

    Whether that's quality football or other offerings doesn't really matter. This part of the South has long been ignored by ‘serious money' and we are all hungry for attention, especially when it brings investment to the Club at the same time.

    Presumably that's what Mr Gaydamak had in mind when he took over the Club. Unfortunately for him his pockets weren't deep enough and global events foreshortened his ambition. Let's all hope though that when all this is concluded the Doc is delighted with his investment and Sacha walks off with his shirt intact and his bank account healthier than it was a few weeks ago.

     

     

    Peter Storrie will be in big demand by other Clubs looking for a buyer.

     

     

  • Ooh La la! More French for the bench

    Just kidding Paul Hart - myPompey member Allez Pompey takes a good look at the talent available on the other side of La Manche

    Now that the football is out the way, it's time for silly season to begin with the seemingly endless supply of transfer rumours. Rather than concentrate on the press-induced closing down sale that Pompey are apparently having, I thought it would be far more interesting looking at who could come the other way. And where better to look than France where a large number of Pompey's former and current stars played before they moved across the Channel. I'll be looking at players that won't break the bank, and whilst I'd love to include the likes of Yoann Gourcuff, I think it's better we remain reasonably realistic.

    Jérémy Mathieu, currently of Toulouse FC, primarily a left-back and just 25 years old should be our first port of call. He loves getting forward like Johnson on the right, but makes sure he defends as a priority. Left back is surely a position that needs addressing in the summer with Hermann the only man left to do the job and with him turning 35 next month, competition in this position is vital. If Mathieu came to Pompey there is no doubt he would secure the position in the same way Johnson has on the other side. Bigger clubs than Pompey will be interested in him but the added bonus that he is on a free transfer this summer means that Pompey should be at the front of the queue.

    Yohann Pelé is a name that will ring some bells with Pompey fans. We've been linked with the Le Mans goalkeeper in the past and are surely interested again this summer. There is no doubt in my mind that David James is one of the greatest ever goalkeepers to pull on the Pompey shirt, but his form this season has dipped with his save/shot ratio slipping him towards the bottom of the league from his heady perch last year. Perhaps now isn't the time to replace him and perhaps we could get another season out of him, but Pelé is one of the best goalkeepers in Ligue 1 and at only 26 still has his best years ahead of him. Again available on a free transfer this summer, Pompey should be very interested.

    Modeste M'Bami is the box-to-box midfielder we have been searching for. OK he is not Diarra or Muntari but he has more in common with those two midfield dynamo's than he does with Hayden Mullins. For a club like us, M'Bami would be a fantastic signing and with Diop by his side would turn Pompey's central midfield into a once-again feared unit. The good news? He is available on a free transfer from Marseille and has spoken fondly of England, and indeed Pompey's interest, before. The bad news? There is likely to be a host of clubs interested, including a handful of Europa qualified clubs.

    Another Marseilles midfielder available on a free this summer is Zenden formally of Chelsea, Middlesbrough and Liverpool. OK at 32 he is no spring chicken but on occasions he dominates the Marseille midfielder like only someone of his quality can. Personally, I'd like us to keep Niko and try to develop his talents. But if we get a massive offer for Niko and are looking for a play-making alternative that won't break the bank, then I feel we could do far worse than recruit Zenden on a free.

    Moussa Sissoko, a 19 year old midfielder of Toulouse is one to watch. He has enjoyed a good season with Toulouse and seems to be getting better with each game. Toulouse will want to keep hold of him and he is not out of contract this summer so a transfer fee would be required. Personally I think he will be staying with Toulouse for at least another season while he enjoys improving at a club that has a knack of nurturing young talent. He is one to watch though and I expect big things from him in the coming seasons.

    Étienne Capoue, also of Toulouse and again a young midfielder (21) must surely have a bright future. Toulouse know these two young stars are being watched and have put them both on an improved three year contract. Both are interested in moves to England (or Spain) but both seem likely to stay with Toulouse for at least a season before moving on. Expect a reasonable transfer fee though for both.

    Another youngster improving fast is 18 year old Belgian Eden Hazard, currently of Lille. An attacking midfielder with an eye for goal is surely already being watched by a host of scouts to see how he develops. Again one to watch but like the two above may enjoy another season under his belt with his current club before moving on - and up - the football ladder.

    So there we have it, 4 available on free transfers and 3 youngsters fast improving. Of course, before all this we have the small problem of finding a new owner, and perhaps a new manager? But whoever they are, they could do worse than look to Ligue 1 for a few freebies and bargains that will be sure to improve our team. PUP

     

    Jérémy Mathieu. Dig that shirt!

    Filed under:
  • Pompey, Everton, Villa, Newcastle - Manchester United's Cannon Fodder

    I sat wondering over the weekend what the likes of Adams and Hart were thinking about Shearer's inability to keep Newcastle in the top flight. Hart sort of implied a few weeks back that Premier League survival needed more than a few messianic acts and it looks like he was right.

    You have to wonder what was going through Shearer's mind when he took the job with just eight games to go. Obviously a very confident and articulate man, but not quite up to lifting the Toon clear of relegation.

    In the end Newcastle were relegated for want of a point. Had Hull not amassed a Europe threatening tally early on, they would have been dead and buried long ago and Shearer would have been paraded around Newcastle in his very own open top bus.

    For sure as our Harry would say, nobody has a right to be in the Premier League, not even a Club as big as Newcastle. If that's true then how long before the money spinning top four follow suit? Statistically of course, one day, assuming the league continues as it is, every club in the Prem will taste life in a lower division. Just as a room full of monkeys given time would publish the Sun, so too will come the day when United get relegated. Manchester that is, not Newcastle.

    But that's not going to happen any day soon. Manchester United through a combination of brand and money market exploitation can buy their way out of trouble years in advance. Just like Arsenal, albeit on a bigger scale, United's kids are good enough to win most matches in which they play today, to say nothing of how good they will be in years to come.

    What does that mean? For the larger part, United's success for next year and the year after has already been paid for. Even if the Glazers insist that the entire first team squad is sold, United's kids will still bring home the silver, perhaps not 10 points clear or whatever it is, but good enough to beat the rest.

    And that's the problem. Whereas most clubs live day to day, hand to mouth in some cases, others live off their investments, if not financial then certainly in terms of depth of squad and young player pipeline.

    How can Pompey or any of the other 16 Premier League teams compete when for example, United's youngsters are capable of scoring better goals in 10 minute cameos than our top strikers manage all season? Of course we can't but are we even expected to?

    The League could change all this of course, but it won't. It wants to be the best league in Europe and it wants English teams to bring home the European silver. And to do so means it must promote the interests of the Top 4 to the detriment of the rest. The Premier League needs us to be the Top 4's cannon fodder so that our failure at home can breed their success in Europe.

    It's a sad fact but it's true. Europe is the root cause of the imbalance which affects the English league system and for that matter most other leagues in Europe.  If UEFA introduce a handicap system into Champions League and Europa Cup qualification that favours performance per pound spent rather than league position then perhaps the system might well sort itself out sooner rather than later.

    We'd see SAF and co think twice about spending millions at the drop of a hat and City for example would be neutered for want of a better word, into a team struggling to overcome the weight of its investment.

    Isn't that how it should be?

     

    Ole Gunnar Solskjaer now doing his thing with the reserves

  • Beckham's shirt sales dwarf Pompey's turnover

    I was gobsmacked when I heard that the Beckham effect has transformed A.C. Milan's finances over the last year. In the 12 months leading up to his arrival at the San Siro, Milan sold 900,000 replica shirts and at £60+ a go that's over £50,000,000 in shirt sales alone.

    But then came Beckham. Milan revealed that shirt sales leapt to 3,000,000 since Golden Ball's arrival. That's another £120,000,000 literally on the back of Beckham. Starts to make the odd first class flight to California and bit a compensation to LA Galaxy seem very good business indeed.

    Ok we're not Milan and Crouchie isn't Becks but nonetheless it does make you wonder what could be if we managed to convince a high profile player or two to come and spend a year or so on the south coast. Hell, we wouldn't even care if they contributed on the pitch. A couple of Linvoy like cameos would be fine... preferably with at least once appearance in each of the three kits.

    If Beckham does come to England then you can be sure he will head for London, having never played for a Club in our capital city. Spurs have already let it be known that they'd welcome his arrival, if only to cut back the Redknapp induced overdraught that's accumulated in the past 9 months.

    But even without Becks there are plenty of players out there that have massive fan followings and why wouldn't they want to come and play a year or so in the Prem? Remembering that merchandising is the key motivator, we'd want someone from a big country with a hunger for replica shirts and Brazil fits the bill nicely.

    Ronaldinho I'm told was impressed with what he saw and heard last year so perhaps we could tempt him and one or two others to come and sample the Pompey Chimes for a couple of years. Ok, let's be honest with ourselves, we aren't going to attract any really big names whilst they are top of their game but we could a lot worse than have a couple of golden oldies see out their twilight years whilst we all share in the proceeds.

    Sure we aren't going to be selling 3,000,000 shirts a year anytime soon, but even a tenth of that number would be very welcome indeed. And you have to ask yourselves this, based on Milan's success the question is now can we afford not to go after these players? I for one would welcome their arrival and even though I've never been one to go for replica shirts, especially with players' names on the backs, I reckon they'd quickly become collectors' pieces and I'd be front of the queue.

     

    See also: Italian football on the decline

     

    Shame about the tattoo

     

     


    Announcing the new myPompey Screensaver here.

    Filed under:
  • The stained glass window

    I bet like me you were glued to the news in January, hoping for salvation in the form of a few signings to bolster the then recently depleted squad.

    Adams has already made clear since leaving that his pocket money was docked unexpectedly a few days before Christmas, leaving him little choice but to scour the small ads in search of a few bargains. If not bargains then loan players prepared to give their all in the forthcoming battle.

    He also made big the fact that we needed players to come in and play their part immediately.  On that basis one or two names were rejected, either following fitness tests or because they hadn't played for their own clubs for some months leading up to the Window.

    Let's not go over too much old ground here (no new stadium then???) other than to remind ourselves that at the time we were all perplexed at why we should be chasing the likes of Saviola for weeks only then to be told he wouldn't be signing because he hadn't played for a couple of months.

    Following the Saviola rejection, which incidentally followed statements from the Club that Peter Storrie was trying to cut a deal for him, Adams made it clear that only players capable of going straight into the first team would be joining in the Window.

    So in came Mullins, Basinas, Gekas, Pele and Pennant. I was going to research the order in which they arrived, but why bother? The whole window thing in retrospect turned out to be a complete farce.

    Pele, supposedly a bright young thing didn't get within an Algarve runway of the first team and Gekas as we know played 90 seconds and didn't even kick the ball. Good enough to score in the meantime in an International against Israel, but only worthy of making up the numbers on training ground kick-abouts  when it came to Pompey.

    Of those that did grace the Fratton turf, Basinas' situation seems the most bizarre. He may be getting on a bit but he showed what he could do under Adams. But Hart dropped him quicker than quick, preferring Hughes and Mullins even though their selection was at the root of the problems we faced in midfield.

    Of the January 5, at least Mullins and Pennant got to play a few games. Mullins an almost ever present despite surely the worst pass completion ratio in the team and Pennant rarely showing the form that had Adams raving about him when he arrived.

    Looking back at the situation you do wonder how much of whole January palaver was no more than planned smoke and mirrors. Keep the existing squad on their toes, tell the fans what they want to hear and the rest will take care of itself.

    Only it didn't. Or perhaps it did. I don't know to be honest. Great, we avoided the drop but at what price in terms of four months of relegation hell? Had we perhaps realised that the squad we had on January 1 was in fact not too bad at all, maybe we could have directed our efforts at what we really needed. A fast partner for Crouch and someone creative in midfield instead of all this 5 player nonsense of which none you might argue, actually delivered what was expected of them. Some through no fault of their own it would be reasonable to conclude.

    Based on recent performances though, we had enough in the squad without bringing anybody in. Would we really have done any worse with Wilson replacing Mullins and Johnson or Kaboul replacing Pennant? And that's without playing Utaka where he has begged to played ever since he arrived. In the middle with a ball to run on to ...

    Meanwhile, the five are no more. Pennant, Pele and Gekas have gone. Leaving us with a 'two' in the form of Mullins and Basinas, the latter of which Peter Storrie recently confirmed has a future at Fratton Park. I don't know what to make of that other than to say.... doing what?

    If we have learned one thing from our profligate time with Redknapp and latterly Hart's selection u-turn, it's that we do have strength in depth. We, that is the Club, the Fans and most importantly the Manager, need to realise that just because a player hasn't featured for a while, doesn't mean he's past it.

    Of all people, you'd expect Hart to understand the rejuvenating effects of a little TLC and there are many on the payroll that might benefit from his attention. Please let's not have a clear out until we fully understand what each has to offer. It will be a crying shame to let half the squad go at knock down prices only to see them surface elsewhere, working their magic for a manager who gave them a chance.

     

  • The Restaurant at the end of the Universe

    Spare a thought for Peter Storrie as he packs his trunks hoping to grab a well earned piece of R&R as he travels the globe in search of the ‘Deal'.

    I make it a little over 80 days to the start of ‘the' season and it would be nice to have some beer money in the bank before the pubs call time at the end of the window.

    I suppose Hart & Storrie must be looking at the players in much the same way as the cow perused his saleable assets in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.  Hart thinking that a little cattle trading might bring in two or three solid ‘lads' at the expense of one or more Redknapp babes. 

    Storrie on the other hand is conscious that if he doesn't find a buyer, players will definitely be leaving with no guarantees as to any cash being available for their replacements. Replacements that is in quantity, if not quality.

    In some respects Hart is between a rock and hard place. If we have no cash then his job is probably safe at the expense of wrestling with a depleted squad on the edge of the dreaded drop zone for most of the season. Of course I could be wrong, but it's a reasonable to assume that Hart might struggle if players aren't replaced.

    On the other hand, if money is forthcoming then all sorts of conditions may be attached. The manager, one of the more obvious appointments that new money might wish to influence. Unless H&K are ‘re-confirmed' as the permanent team in the next week or so, then you can be sure that any such announcement is contingent on getting approval from new owners.

    Storrie must know exactly what the net operating position of the Club is. Good or bad there will be a sum in his mind that he needs to acquire so as to keep the Club running if the current discussions fall through. He's probably already earmarked the players he needs to sell or if he doesn't know exactly who is leaving, then it's probably a touch of the Vordermans, 2 from the top row and 3 from the rest...

    I think we will be lucky to see Glen here next year. Crouch too. Both are fit and can go straight into the shop window, that's assuming that there isn't already one or more Diarra like deals waiting to be executed or cancelled, as soon as the financial situation polarizes one way or the other.

    Immaterial of the funds in the bank, Johnson with his head in England's clouds looks to me like he's ready to go. His occasional shows of petulance more suited to the ego laden top four than a Pompey team where dissent is an unwelcome occurrence.

    Whatever happens in the next 3 months one thing is for sure, I'd rather we faced it in the Prem than languishing in the Fizzy. Good luck to ‘Boro, Newcastle, Hull and Sunderland this weekend. We may have troubles, but I wouldn't want to be in their shoes.

     

    The Restaurant at the end of the Universe

     

  • Hart's Nukey Brown hangover

    After Shearer did the decent thing, Pompey can now renew its own season ticket and book a seat at Europe's finest league table. Great news for all Pompey fans and of course the Club itself.

    Paul Hart though, whilst quietly celebrating his own success, is left with a dilemma. After planning on securing Premier League status in a nail biting last match of the season, he now has to deliver on promises to change his style now relegation has been avoided.

    As Hart himself has implied, he thinks like a defender because he was a defender and that might prove a little difficult to ignore as he prepares for the season ahead and.... the small matter of the last two matches before season's end.

    There's no lack of attacking talent in the team. Take your pick from Crouch, Kanu, Utaka, Kranjcar, Johnson, Nugent and....it's been so long, I've forgotten his name... oh yeah Gekas. Add to that Belhadj, Pennant and Mvuemba and you'd argue that we have an embarrassment of attack minded players available for selection.

    The problem is that Hart has been reluctant to start with any of them save Crouch, even though by Crouch's own words he is struggling playing up front alone. And that's the problem. When Redknapp bought Defoe and Crouch and sold Benjani, he removed our ability to play the lone striker up front, yet a defensive 4-5-1 appears to be Hart's preferred formation.

    What does this mean for next season? Putting aside the fact that Crouch may have to be sold, if he stays, Hart will surely be forced to adopt 4-4-2 or a genuine 4-3-3. How can Crouch stay if 4-5-1 remains the dominant formation?

    That's the dilemma facing Hart. Keep Crouch and he'll be forced to drop 4-5-1 or leave Crouch out of the starting eleven on a regular basis. Dropping Crouch is not an option. Too much money sitting on the bench just won't do when the Club is strapped for cash. Even if Crouch stays and Hart does adopt a more attacking style then we will have to find Crouch a partner and add pace to the midfield to cover the gaps that appear once the 5 turns to a 4.

    The Club appears set on selling Utaka. Gekas has no future here, Peter Storrie made that clear last week. That leaves super-sub Kanu and ‘tries hard' Nugent. Neither what you'd consider to be a serious contenders for a regular place up front. Not if we plan on scoring more goals next season than we did this.

    If Crouch stays we will need to buy a new striker to partner him, which ironically forces Hart further away from a five man midfield and I cannot see that being an option.

    Which leads me to believe that Crouch may well be leaving us. As good as he is, his style will not offer Hart the flexibility he needs to switch formations on a regular basis.  With Crouch likely to fetch the best part of £10m, that may be too much to resist.

    In his place I wouldn't be surprised to see Benjani back who now appears to be at best a fringe player at Eastlands. The return of the Pompey favourite will be a welcome move amongst fans and will restore some much needed balance. Who knows maybe he'll come anyway, immaterial of what happens to Crouch. Now that would be an interesting combination wouldn't it?

     

    Tai Chi lessons at Fratton Park

     

     

     

    Filed under: , ,
  • Irony runs deep with Pompey rejects

    I thought Glen Little did ok against Milan. Yes, agreed, he looked a little like a cart horse amongst Ferraris at times, but there was no doubting his raging bull commitment.  Sure his final ball may not have had the pin point precision of ... pause, searching for current Pompey player with good delivery ... of ..., ok may not have the pin point delivery expected of a Premier League player, but what he lacked in skill he made up for in energy.

    Those of you at the Milan match will remember his frustration at times when he wasn't given the ball on the right wing. Rather than stand there Utaka like, he ran to the other wing, grabbed it and .... promptly gave it away.

    So sheep botherer or raging bull, call him what you will, but let's not kid ourselves,  Glen Little is not the type of player we thought would be gracing Fratton Towers when we won the FA Cup just 12 short months ago.

    Which is why his signing along with Jerome Thomas raised a few eyebrows. You got the distinct feeling that after betting his wedge on Crouch and Defoe, Redknapp shoved his loose change in the nearby slots and out popped a couple of lower league players. Never one to look a gift horse in the mouth, he signed them up and.... they watched the campaign from the comfort of somewhere other than the pitch for most of the season.

    Whether Little, currently on loan at Reading or Thomas, now fully recovered from his back injury, were good enough for the team that started last year is of no consequence because the team that starts next year will in all likelihood be made of players with very similar levels of ability. Given they are known quantities, we could do worse than keep them both.

    But, ironically both are here on one year deals making them free agents in a week or so and given Hart hasn't seen fit to play either of them, then presumably both are yesterday's news.

    With the likes of Gekas, Basinas, Mvuemba, Thomas and Little not getting a sniff under Hart you have to question where he thinks he's going to get better from next year assuming he's got the best part of 10 chocolate buttons to play with.

    As some folks are at odds to point out, us fans know nothing and we shouldn't second guess the experienced pros. Fair enough. Let's agree that Hart knows what he's doing and he's got a whole of players ready to bring in for petty cash that are better than the ones he's about to let go.

     

    Thomas v United. Good enough for Redknapp...

     

     

    Filed under: ,
  • Team spending limits to be introduced next year

    Don't worry folks it's not going to affect us. Yet...

    Instead Max Mosley, he who didn't do all that ‘stuff', is pushing ahead with plans to introduce a two tiered Formula 1 Championship from 2010. The idea being to handicap teams spending more than £40,000,000 a year and in doing so incentivise teams keeping within the limits by allowing them more freedom with their technological designs.

    Removing restrictions on rear wing design, which is just one of the difference in the tiers, is expected to reduce times by up to two seconds a lap . That doesn't sound too drastic until you realise that 2 seconds equates to 2 minutes over the length of a Grand Prix. Leading to thoughts of Ferrari still racing until long after the Champagne has been popped.

    As a result, the wealthy teams, led by the red cars, are throwing their Rolexes out of their carbon tubs, threatening to pull out of the sport if the decision is not reversed.

    Mosley and Ecclestone, yes the one with a part share in QPR, are both adamant that changes are necessary. The short one is saying that although Formula 1 is currently still receiving revenues from contracts negotiated before the Crunch, he expects things to tighten in future, having a knock on effect on smaller teams' ability to raise increasing amounts of sponsorship money on an annual basis.

    It's not surprising that the big boys don't want changes.  Money speaks in Formula 1 just as it does in football and a levelling of the track or in our case the playing field, is the last thing the money bags want.

    Formula 1's troubles come at a time when the Premier League is rumoured to be increasingly distressed at the financial state of some of the Clubs.  This coincides with Setanta attempting to renegotiate its payment schedule to the Premier League, an appeal which was rejected out of hand last week.

    Interesting times for all big money sports and Formula 1's attempts to remove some of the costs of participation will surely not go unnoticed by Football's governing bodies.

     

    Ferrari to be racing themselves next year?

     

  • Redknapp's relegation busters better than Hart's?

    This time 3 years ago Redknapp worked a little Saintly magic and undid Perrin's Gallic mischief. With a barely believable run we came from nowhere and stayed up thanks to some wonderful performances from old faithfuls such as Taylor, Primus and O'Neil and newly arrived players in the form of Davis, Pamerot, Mendes and Benjani. Oops D'Allesandro too.

    Which got us thinking. How good was that team of ‘06 and how does it compare with Hart's inherited team of internationals.

    Prior to looking back at the 06 squad my immediate preconception was that today's squad is far stronger, but perhaps not.

    With the exception of Kiely, Redknapp's eleven that played Sunderland at around the same time as we are playing them next week (in game numbers if not actual date) look comparable to the team that Hart is likely to play.

    Yes there are very obvious differences in terms of quality in some positions, Johnson sticks out for example, but then you could say that Redknapp's 4-4-2 looks a lot more balanced than Hart's contrived 4-5-1.

    What do you reckon? I think it's a close thing and if James was playing for us back then, I'd suggest the 06 team might even be stronger.

    Note that Mendes was a regular but didn't play against Sunderland and I am unsure exactly where D'Allesandro started that day.

    I'll leave you to remember the result ....

    More analysis here

     

  • Redknapp v the rest: The Facts!

    Following heated debate on myPompey and other Pompey forums about Paul Hart, we thought it might be interesting to compare the performances of Redknapp, Adams and Hart during the season.

    It's a complex subject and when viewed simply as points per game, Redknapp is head and shoulders above both Adams and Hart.

    Redknapp left Fratton Park with a 1.625 points per game (ppg) average which would have given us around 62 points if that form had continued throughout the season (38 x 1.625).

    Adams as you can see on the chart below only briefly went above the relegation threshold which requires an average of 1.05 pts per game in order to hit the magic 40 points by the end of the season. Our Tone ended his tenure with .687 ppg which had he been in charge for all 38 matches, would probably have seen us finish with around 26 points.

    Hart started well and hovered around the 1.5 ppg mark until the recent slump. He's currently averaging 1.167 ppg which is just above the 1.05 required to hit 40pts. As you can see Hart inherited the team that at the time, thanks to Adams' poor average, was hovering just above the danger zone. It's interesting to note that Hart's current average would give him 44.33 pts for the season. And it is this figure that worries his critics.

    Cash Utilization

    However, that's only part of the story. When we build squad value into account we get an approximate cash utilization figure. This is a myPompey assessment of value for money, or how well a manager is doing when you take into account the value of the squad he has at his disposal.

    We have valued Redknapp's squad at £85m and taking into account the loss of Diarra and Defoe both Adams and Hart were working with a squad valued at somewhere around £55m. The exact figures don't matter too much because the chart shows the approximate performance of the managers (pink dashed line).

    What stands out here is that until the recent 1 point from 9 run, Hart was performing way above Adams (you don't need a chart for that considering both had the same squad) and way above Redknapp in terms of getting the most out of the players. The recent bad form however has dropped him to a similar performance as Redknapp when you take account what they had at their disposal.

    Conclusions

    What is clear is that Adams had to go. Redknapp's prior performance flattered our league position under Adams, but when you look at his isolated performance, 26 points on a season long basis just wouldn't cut it.

    Redknapp was heading for another 60+ points, but of course he wasn't. He knew the squad was going to be broken up so he left.

    Hart. Based on his earlier form Hart would be a great manager going forward. However recent performances suggest we will struggle next season unless Hart has money to spend. Hart would argue that he is managing someone else's squad and that has to be taken into account.

    But if funds are not available and the squad stays as it we can deduce that next season will see us achieve around 44 points, which is still possible this season.

    However if players leave then it's reasonable to assume based on Hart's prior performance, that next season we will struggle to get near to the 44 point mark, suggesting another rough ride is in store.

     

     

    More analysis here

     

     

     

  • Spearmint Rhino

    Wrigley's finest has let it be known that today's battle of the 'almost safe' will not be played to a draw. We're going to whoop their uncured hides or words to that effect, escaping betwixt another chew on an ancient slab of gum.

    Love him or hate, and I sit firmly on the side of "thank **** we didn't get him", Allardyce does have a certain appeal. Ok, he may not be ‘up there' so to speak, but he's certainly a safe pair of hands and his ability goes much further than skin deep. Thankfully.

    Sam pioneered many of the conditioning regimes we accept as standard practice today. His setup at Bolton was more like an experimental lab than a football club and what his teams lacked in tactical prowess they made up for in fitness and attitude.

    It seemed reasonable then that Blackburn turned to Allardyce when Paul Ince was shown the door in late December. Nothing much changed under Sam other than confidence being restored and Blackburn becoming a little harder to beat.

    In many respects the whole saga mirrored our own suffering at Fratton Park. Young manager given his wings only to find them clipped a few weeks later. At the time Blackburn's board rejected comments that they'd acted hastily and pointed out that being 6 points adrift at Christmas required immediate action. Fair point especially considering that with 3 games left Blackburn's fate, like ours, is still up in the air.

    At the time, Adams sensing blood in the water, added his ten penny worth.

    "I was very angry about Paul's sacking. I like Paul a tremendous amount and I was gutted for him".

    "It was spineless that the man who employed him can sack him just as quickly as that".

    Perhaps these comments as much as any made by Tony summed up why he didn't make a success of his tenure at Fratton Towers. If football was principally about high ethics and morals then the Premier League would be full to the brim of people like Tony Adams. But it's not.

    The fact is, to be successful you have to be a thick skinned rhino. Spearmint in Sam's case. Which leads us inevitably to Paul Hart. Whether the Premier League has space for such a seemingly nice guy remains to be seen. But let's hope so.

     

     

  • A team full of Johnsons

    Sitting here enjoying Chelsea v Barcelona and revelling at the talent on display.

    Have you noticed how little those players panic? Content, if beaten at all, to be beaten by a better move, but never a better player. Never a nerve on show and each and every one a master in their chosen role.

    It struck me that it must be great to support a team that sits on the spending end of an endless cheque book. Don't get me wrong, Pompey till I die and all that, but how cool would it be if Pompey had 11 players the quality of Glen Johnson?

    Of course it's not going to happen, unless Branson or the Duke of Westminster fancy a flutter and if even if they do, money doesn't guarantee success, ask Levy.

    Instead we need to understand who we are. More importantly who they are. How long before the Champions League is replaced by a permanent European Super League, complete with the 20 best teams from around Europe, battling it out every week?

    Meanwhile, let the rest of us compete against our peers and If and when we get to a level where we can challenge the chosen ones, then so be it.

    Until then, let's not kid ourselves who we are and who they are. Like I said, love watching their football, but don't like losing home and away, year in and year out.

    Just a thought.

     

1 2 Next >
© Copyright Sports Prototypes - 2008, 2009, 2010
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems