Mike Hall of SOS Pompey asked myPompey to publish a reply to this GoldenBoot article.
Here it is:
GoldenBoot: Asking why previous owners were allowed to take over the club with little if any scrutiny? Errr No!
Mike Hall: -Wrong. This was asked, but the results have to wait fro the minutes. We discussed the Pemier Leagues ability to have a face to face interview with any applicant to the FAPPT. Such an interview would have disqualified Al Fahim and Al Faraj in my opinion, simply because their answers would have been unlikely to withstand scrutiny. And Al Faraj wouldn't have come anyway. We suggested face to face, they accepted it.
-
GoldenBoot: Protesting against the Premier League for banning us from the transfer marker .... Eerrr No!.
Mike Hall: We didn't do this no, because they were absolutely right. We couldn't maintain our payments under contracts. Signing more players in a month when we had to sell players to pay the wages - how ridiculous is this? How are we going to pay them in February? Explain to me how allowing a football club with reckless owners employing a fraudster and who are unable to pay either of their major creditors, pay their players, pay their transfer fees, pay their suppliers should be signing more players? We had our website shut down last week until a director paid the bill on his credit card, and not one of the owners either. We can't keep our website going but should be allowed to sign more players? Don't be daft!
-
GoldenBoot: Holding the League to account for destroying the cashflow of the Club and withholding money and causing financial stress despite rubber stamping transfers, Errr NO!!
Mike Hall: The Premier League was protecting our cashflow. The premier league has a complete picture at all times of what is owed to who. They have to strike a balance between keeping back money to make sure we pay people, (like Watford who would otherwise have gone bust), and making sure the club can pay for things. However, at a time when Danny Azougy was running the club they made sure the money went straight to our creditors. You would rather Azougy had it than the premier league giv it to our creditors?
-
GoldenBoot: Offering the League the possibility of interfering with a privately owned business and in doing so potentially scaring off any chance of fresh investment... and a week before Mr Chainrai might have to fork out a few million to HMRC. Errrrr YES!
Mike Hall: We suggested to the league they place an observer onsite during the opening phase of Chainrais ownership. They will consider it. We did this because the point a fair few contributors have missed is this; Chainrai is not a new owner. Chainrai is connected to the Gaydamaks, Levi Kushnir, Ron Maneh, Yoram Yossifoff and Danny Azougy going back years. There is a matrix of deals between these guys that demonstrates beyond any doubt that they are a consortium. In fact, Arkadi Gaydamak owned Beitar Jerusalem. Danny Azougy went in to loot it. Chainrai took it over in a legal action shortly afterward and sold it. Does that sound familiar to you?
The money Balram Chainrai put into Pompey came from where? Arkadi Gaydamak. He took the money he got from Arkadi Gaydamak and put it into a club in which his old friends Ron Maneh, Yoram Yossifoff, (also involved in a number of the same deals as Chainrai and Gaydamak), and Danny Azougy were heavily involved.
Avram Grant signed his contract in Ron Manehs front room, with Yoram Yossifoff and Danny Azougy present according to the Jewish Chronicle. All these guys were involved in the August takeover attempt. All have been to games. All are advisers to 'Ali al Faraj'.
In other words, all the people heavily involved in running Pompey are not on the board. All are part of a close knit business circle going back years.
We have moved into the end game now, where Chainrai comes in, smiles at everyone, tells them what a good guy he is and negotiates the sale. Isn't it coincidental that at the moment a buyer firms up his interest Chainrai steps in and cuts Al Faraj out of the deal? There is now money to be made.
The aim of the Premier League is to ensure the club survives, and that is our aim too. The key to this is securing owners who are transparently interested in the club, not persuing some strange game across continents all involving the same names time and time again and always involving endless legal actions, high interest loans and Danny Azougy.
The Premier League has devoted a lot of time to ensuring our survival, and I hope all sensible Pompey fans will see that what is needed here is an end to this biblical plague of owners who all turn out to be connected to each other in some way.
Mike Hall
SOS Pompey